THE NEW SHIBBOLETH
Signs of Human-AI Distinction
Signs of Human-AI Distinction
'Say now Shibboleth'; and he said 'Sibboleth'; for he could not frame to pronounce it right
Book of Judges, 12:6
The New Shibboleth Project explores the signs people use to distinguish human from AI-generated language, and what this new culture of suspicion is doing to the way we read and write.
In the biblical story of the Shibboleth (literally, an ear of grain in Hebrew, and some say a rushing stream), a single mispronounced word separated insider from outsider. Since then, it has named any indicator that identifies someone as one of us or one of them, as fully human or something less so. The Shibboleth has always defined what it means to be considered human at moments when the distinction between self and other is threatened.
Today, a new version of this test is playing out between humans and AI. We have entered an age of suspicion, in which the origin of texts is increasingly scrutinized and readers search for signs that might reveal whether a text was written by a human or generated by a machine. Yet research consistently shows that most users across fields cannot reliably make this distinction.
The New Shibboleth Project investigates this emerging culture of suspicion and its consequences. The Turing test, which has long shaped how we think about the boundary between human and machine, was fundamentally a test of performance: can a machine imitate a human well enough to fool a judge? The Shibboleth is a test of belonging: does the speaker display the signs that mark them as one of us, humans? The question is no longer whether machines can pass a Turing test. Now we are asking what kinds of cultural tensions the constant search for the new Shibboleth creates and what it reveals about conceptions of what is distinctly human. This search is already producing new practices of suspicious reading, as readers scrutinize texts for signs of machine authorship, and new forms of writing, as writers increasingly anticipate that suspicion and respond to it.
The project has three purposes:
Mapping the critical thought and cultural representation of the Shibboleth across history, and providing a theoretical framework for understanding the Shibboleth in the case of nonhuman entities.
Developing a timeline of the shifting indicators that users recognize as AI’s Shibboleths since large language models went public. Analyzing what they reveal about perceptions of what makes language human.
Examining how the search for AI Shibboleths is changing writing itself, as writers anticipate suspicion and develop new stylistic practices to assert their human authorship.
This is a rare moment in the history of language. We intend to understand it.